

Written for decision-makers, this is usually concise and focused on one question: does the project merit an executive's time, development or acquisition? The writer may never see this report.
Representatives assess both the screenplay and the writer's potential. They may be interested in a distinctive voice and development potential even when the current draft is not yet production-ready.
Commissioned by the writer, this should identify strengths, weaknesses and priorities for the next draft. The useful part is not merely the verdict but clear, actionable feedback the writer can apply.
Contests use internal coverage to score and filter entries. Optional feedback bought by a writer is usually shorter, and its depth and usefulness can vary considerably according to the contest and reader.
| Type of coverage | Typical cost | Written for | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio & agency coverage | Not for sale (written by staff readers) | Execs deciding what to read | 2-3 pages: synopsis, brief comments, verdict. You'll likely never see it |
| Contest coverage | $40-$100 as an entry add-on | Writers entering contests | Short feedback. Quality varies a lot by reader |
| Professional coverage services | $69-$499+ depending on depth | Writers developing a script | Full report: synopsis, detailed notes, grades, verdict, often inline margin notes |
| AI coverage tools | $10-$40 | Early drafts | Instant structural checks. No human judgement or industry context |
Before you enter contests or fellowships
Before you query managers, agents or producers
After a major rewrite, to test whether the fixes landed


Al is the founder and CEO of Script Reader Pro. He started SRP after one too many rounds of vague, unhelpful coverage on his own scripts. Every reader on the team is a produced, working screenwriter, matched to your script by genre.
Meet the readers · Al's story · Last updated October 2026







